Recruiting & HR
Upload resumes, job descriptions, and interview notes. SaralFlow produces a candidate comparison and hiring packet.
Sample packet
Candidate comparison & hiring packet
Sample search · Senior Product Engineer role (fictional)
Executive summary
What happened, what matters, and what to do next — from documents SaralFlow reviewed.
Three finalists evaluated for Senior Product Engineer — 9 interview dimensions scored against job description.
Candidate A (Priya Sharma): strongest technical and culture fit; 2 positive references on file.
Candidate B (Daniel Torres): solid mid-senior match but unsigned background check authorization blocks offer stage.
Candidate C (Mei Lin): high skill match with overqualified risk — 9 years experience may prefer manager track.
Hiring recommendation: extend offer to Candidate A; retain C as backup with retention discussion.
Key findings
- Job summary: Senior Product Engineer — React, TypeScript, API design required
- Candidate comparison: A (Priya) 9/10 match · B (Daniel) 7/10 · C (Mei) 8/10 with overqualified risk
- Interview evidence: 9 dimensions scored across 3 panel interviewers for each finalist
- Reference evidence: Candidate A — 2 strong references citing leadership and delivery
- Missing docs: Candidate B background check authorization unsigned — blocks offer
- Hiring risks: Candidate C may seek manager role within 12 months in IC position
- Recommendation: offer Candidate A · backup C with retention discussion · request B auth if needed
Timeline
- 2026-03-25 — Panel interviews
3 candidates — 3 interviewers each
- 2026-04-02 — Reference checks
Candidate A references completed — strong
- 2026-04-10 — Scorecard compiled
9-dimension comparison matrix finalized
- 2026-04-18 — Compliance review
Candidate B background auth flagged unsigned
Output sections
Candidate comparison
- A (Priya Sharma): 7 yrs · 9/10 skill match · strong refs
- B (Daniel Torres): 5 yrs · 7/10 match · missing auth
- C (Mei Lin): 9 yrs · 8/10 match · overqualified risk
Interview scorecard summary
- Technical skills: A > C > B
- Communication: C > A > B
- Culture fit: A > B > C
- Leadership: A > C > B
Compliance status
- Candidate A: All docs complete ✓
- Candidate B: Background auth missing ⚠
- Candidate C: All docs complete ✓
Hiring recommendation
- Recommend: Candidate A (Priya Sharma)
- Backup: Candidate C (with retention discussion)
- Action: Request Candidate B auth if backup needed
- Offer stage: Ready for Candidate A
Source evidence
- Resume — Candidate A (Priya Sharma) Confirmed
- Resume — Candidate B (Daniel Torres) Confirmed
- Resume — Candidate C (Mei Lin) Confirmed
- Job description — Senior Product Engineer Confirmed
- Interview notes — Panel (3 interviewers) Confirmed
- Reference check — Candidate A (2 refs) Confirmed
- Background check authorization — Candidate B Needs review
Documents reviewed
Resume — Candidate A (Priya Sharma)
ConfirmedResume
7 years experience · senior engineer · 2 prior companies · top skills matched
Resume — Candidate B (Daniel Torres)
ConfirmedResume
5 years experience · mid-senior level · startup background · good skill match
Resume — Candidate C (Mei Lin)
ConfirmedResume
9 years experience · manager-level · strong leadership but overqualified risk
Job description — Senior Product Engineer
ConfirmedJob Description
Required: React, TypeScript, API design · Nice-to-have: ML pipeline, team lead
Interview notes — Panel (3 interviewers)
ConfirmedInterview Notes
Notes for all 3 candidates · 9 evaluation dimensions extracted
Reference check — Candidate A (2 refs)
ConfirmedReferences
Strong references · both cited leadership and delivery quality
Background check authorization — Candidate B
Needs reviewCompliance
Authorization form unsigned — cannot proceed to offer without it
Issues needing review
→ Candidate B — background check unsigned — Background check authorization not signed by Daniel Torres. Cannot proceed to offer stage without it. Request form immediately if he's a finalist.
→ Candidate C — overqualified risk — Mei Lin has 9 years and management experience. Job is IC-level. Assess whether she would stay long-term in an IC role.
→ Candidate A — strong references on file — 2 references for Priya Sharma: both cited leadership, delivery quality, and team collaboration. Ready to use in decision.
Missing documents
- B (Daniel Torres): 5 yrs · 7/10 match · missing auth
- Candidate B: Background auth missing ⚠
- Action: Request Candidate B auth if backup needed
- Signed background check authorization — Candidate B (Daniel Torres) — cannot proceed to offer without compliant auth form
- Retention discussion notes for Candidate C — document IC-role expectations before backup offer to reduce flight risk
Recommended next actions
Recommend: Candidate A (Priya Sharma)
Recommend: Candidate A (Priya Sharma)
Backup: Candidate C (with retention discussion)
Backup: Candidate C (with retention discussion)
Action: Request Candidate B auth if backup needed
Action: Request Candidate B auth if backup needed
Offer stage: Ready for Candidate A
Offer stage: Ready for Candidate A
Sample · Demo data — fictional candidates. Not HR or legal advice.